AN EXALTATION OF FIGURES You've probably heard the expression "a Pride of Lions," or maybe "a Gaggle of Geese." Those are collective figures of speech, terms that refer to groups of like creatures in figurative and descriptive language all in one shot. There are a plethora of such expressions, dating back to the fifteenth century's Books of Venery wherein any species of animal that was hunted rather than herded was given a special group modifier ("nouns of multitude" or "company terms"). New modern versions of these expressions are coined every day (philologists have a lot of time on their hands, I guess), such as a "Tantrum of Decorators," or a "Bale of Bondsmen" (the punster in me just loves that one). But to date, I don't think anyone has extended this nominative process to action figures. And I must ask, why not? There's no point in exploring the reasons for such neglect. Rather than curse the linguistic darkness of such disregard, I think it's much better to kindle a candle of appellation and start the ball rolling on making up for the oversights. With this in mind, I think the first stop needs must be the general -- to wit, what would a basic assemblage of our lovely loved icons be? That one's easy: "A Stand of Action Figures." It's simple, clear, and to the point. However, as we all learn, not all action figures maintain their vertical orientation with the same aplomb (or any aplomb at all, for that matter). The protestations of such industry luminaries at the estimable Chet Jacques aside, then, I suggest the following: "A Topple of McMonsters." I know, I know, I love 'em, too. But the darned things do fall over a lot. What can you do? (Use lots of clay and glue, I suppose....) Then of course there's the inevitable and ubiquitous "Peg of Wolverines" in every TRU in the land. Ahem. Moving right along... All of these terms reflect the Venereal Order family known as Characteristic. But there are five other such "families." Rather than behavior, some of these descriptive terms relate to the _appearance_ of group members (or figures), like a "Knot of Toads" or a "Parliament of Owls." Hence, we get "An Agony of Total Justices," or "A Splash of new Spider-Men." "An Enlargement of Hulks" would fit this group, as would "A Crouch of Robot Fighters." Then there are the group names that refer to the Habitat of the members ("A Shoal of Bass," "A Nest of Rabbits"). In action figure parlance, that would lead to "A Dioramance of Marvels," or perhaps "A Shelf of Shortpacks" (hmmm...perhaps not, since that would require the 'packs be _opened_....maybe make that "A Wall of Shortpacks"). Others reflect the Opinion of the observer, such as "A Cowardice of Curs." In action figure terms, this would give us "A Bother of Accessories," "A Clutter of Vehicles," "A Nausea of Bat-Variations," or "A Travesty of 1,701s." Further editorializing produces such evocative labellings as "An Investment of POTF2 Variations," "An Articulation of GI Joes," "A Gawk of Lukes," "A Chortle of Ticks," and even "A Fracture of Scourges." (Incidentally, the other two groups are "error" namings, such as when transcription mistakes changed "Shoal of Fish" into "School of Fish," and onomatopoeic, such as the above-mentioned gaggling geese. And now you can rest easy....) Obviously there are plenty more figure-ative expressions crying to be minted... ...so what are you waiting for? Heck, in no time at all, we can consider ourselves proudly as "A Scurry of Philologists!" _That'll_ wow the idlers over on soc.lang.english.wit, you betcha! ROCK, ROCK, ROCK, ROCK, ROCK 'N ROLL FIGURES Rta-f's own (and illustrious) Jon Hendy recently posed the question of where McFarlane Toys should go on the 10-inch platform heels of their upcoming KISS figures. And with the promised glories of those steadfast rock 'n rollers in mind (uh, KISS, not...never mind), he proposed that McToys' next foray into the world of the musical flesh made plastic should be Journey. Sigh. Maybe it's a generational thing, but I just can't board that particular bus of enthusiasm (or should that be "buss"? Never mind). Journey never did it for me. Maybe they had their share of lightshows and splendiferous costumes, but I don't think I could name a single Journey tune. For that matter, I don't think I could even tell you the year they burst into fame, or come up with a single album title. No, for me, Journey is just not a focus of attention or adoration. But there is another rock group who I think would be the _perfect_ departure point for a new set of figures. And it's not Zeppelin, the Who, the Stones, the Dead (oh, I can just see it -- they'd use the Sam mold for Jerry Garcia, and I'd be disconsolate for weeks), or even Genesis (who used to perform in bizarre costumes, way back when in the Peter Gabriel days). LEND ME YOUR EARS, AND I'LL FIX YOU A CUSTOM.... Think Skies filled with Lucine diamonds, lovely Meters waiting on the attentions of even lovelier Maids, Fixed Holes and Kited Benefits... ...I'm talking about the BEATLES, those Gearest Guys, the Cuddly UK Moptops, of course! Resplendent in their Sergeant Pepper day-glo silk costumes, standing amidst a playset consisting of more famous (and infamous) celebrities and pundits than you could shake a baton at, these things would remake marketing _history_! "Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band Figures" -- who wouldn't go ape for a set! My god, if you think the action figure fan base is large, it's *nothing* compared to the worldwide Beatles fan base! You can't even compare the two! How many hundreds of thousands of copies did the recent Anthology series discs sell? And that was just old product revamped and rehashed for a desperate and loving public. Imagine (so to speak) what the frenzy for brand-new, never-before-seen seven- inch super-detailed FIGURES of the Fab Four would be like. It would be like the first time you heard the chilling chord that initiates "A Hard Day's Night," like the sound of ten pianos being crashed together at the end of "A Day in the Life." Like the last ten seconds of Abbey Road's "The End" but poured into solid form and lasting as long as your eyes would want to feast. We're talking amazing-beyond-amazing. There's John Lennon in his lurid lime-green uniform, orange epaulets blazing under a downturned moustache and signature granny glasses. His guitar would unfurl into a banner which read "Hair Peace, Bed Peace" on one side, and on the other, in plain black-on-white letters, "Imagine." Then Paul McCartney in shiny baby-blue with the still- enigmatic "O.P.D." patch on his left shoulder, armed with a left- strung bass that would convert into a vegetarian barbecue set. Next, George Harrison in rich red with his silly garden party hat over a Fu Manchu half-'stache and big funky square Indian medallion; his guitar shifts into a blissfully smiling Buddha. And then there's Ringo Starr, pretty in pink and looking devilish in his insouciant conductor's cap, sitting astride a Ludwig drum kit-into-hair-salon and sporting a set of rings that would make the Mandarin green with envy (well, greener). Oh, man. Oh, woman! These figures would sell out before they were even _shipped_! And once they vanished at lightspeed in country after country, McToys would correctly read their mandate to pour forth ongoing series upon series of further Beatle figures, to the joy and satisfaction of millions upon millions of music and figure fans alike. I WANNA HOLD YOUR FIGURES! They could start with "Album Cover" sets -- figures of the loveable Liverpudlian's as they appear on each sleeve's photo art, complete with appropriate accouterments from street crossings to steamer trunks, umbrellas and baby carriages, heck, even butcher's aprons and slabs of raw meat. From there, they could do "period" sets -- the Hamburg Beatles (comes with a "Steve the Drunk" figure the boys can roll after a late night set at the Star Club). The US Tour Beatles. Even a special limited edition of "Ed Sullivan Show" figures (complete with ol' Ed himself, of course). Or figures from the movies -- heck, "Help!" toys alone would give new meaning to the term "chase figures." They could do a "Hard Day's Night" set with a "Bag o' Beatlemaniacs" for McFarlane Toy Club members! And of course, we'd _have_ to have appropriately cartoony "Yellow Submarine" figures, along with Blue Meanies, the Lord Mayor, Young Fred and Jeremy Hillary Boob, Ph.D. And a Glove, of course.... And no Beatles figure collection would be complete without the FAO Schwarz exclusive "Lysergic Acid, 1966" set: Beatles in fur vests, hip boots, tinted glasses and too-mod op-art prints -- like, Groovy, man! Oh, I love this idea.... KILLING TO LICENSE "THROOM!" Unfortunately, that's the sound of reality crashing down around our heads (well, my head). Because Beatles' licensing rights are mired in a labyrinthine tangle that Theseus himself couldn't thread. Or even Todd McFarlane. Sob. So it'll never happen. Not ever. Such are dreams returned to the spectral dust from whence they derive. Sigh. I'm down. This particular long and winding road will go untraveled. These figures are for no one, not a first, time, not a second time. I'm a loser, a nowhere man. Can't buy me figures, and I'll cry instead. Baby's in black, and I'm feelin' blue. My guitar is gently weeping, and yer blues. Cry, baby, cry. C'mon, McToys -- there must be an offer that would secure even these rights -- you know the name, look up the number! Ahhh, never mind. Hey, Chet -- could we settle on George Martin? Or maybe the Ruttles? HUNKA HUNKA BURNIN' PLASTIC On the other hand, with my luck, we'll end up with Kenner jumping on the, er, bandwagon -- with nothing less than *Elvis* figures! And they'd be the perfect company to roll these things out, in crazy variant after crazy variant. Dozens, hundreds of Elvi, and a side line of impersonators. With a mail-in Colonel Tom Parker offer and a special 10" King with expanding belly feature. Sigh. Or maybe they will do The Who...at least all those smashed instruments would be easy for McToys to pull off -- they'd just make 'em normal, and by the time you found 'em in the stores, all the accessories would be broken anyway.... Heck, it could even get worse. How, you ask? I have two words for you: "Village People." Because it _almost_ makes sense. Oh, the ignominy of it all.... SILVER ANNIVERSARY By the way, congratulate me. Or congratulate yourself: if you've been here all along since I started this peripatetic dog 'n pony show back in early February 1996, and counting a few guest shots (and _not_ counting one or two reposts that went over like lead balloons), you've just endured your 50th "John's Action Figure Column." Hoo-hah! Virtual cake and ice cream for all -- to paraphrase the ever-lovin' blue-eyed Thing, "it's celebratin' time!" And (shameless plug), if you _haven't_ read all 50 columns, well, what's the delay? They're all archived in glorious black and grey on my quiet little web site (no pictures, no crowds, no waiting: http://www.toymania.com/features/johngersten/index.shtml). Have you hit me today? Isn't it about time....? (I know, the line forms here....<grin>) Thanks as ever for listening. Well, reading.... A guy could not ask for a better audience. Here's writin' to ya!
Comments? Drop me a line....