FIGURES TO THE LEFT OF ME...FIGURES TO THE RIGHT OF ME.... I see action figures in the darnedest places. I'm not talking about hallucinated Pink Ranger elephants, demented daydream visions of Spawn offshoots populating the fringes of a distracted mind -- I mean I see figures all over the place. In real life! Tracey asked me yesterday how many collectors I thought there were, ballpark figure, round numbers, just a guess. It's funny, because it's the kind of measure you'd think we all would carry unconsciously in our minds. I mean, baseball fans have a clear idea that there are a good 60,000 hardy souls who'll come out at the drop of a bat in most major cities to see even a halfway-decent bunch of overpaid expectorators vie for momentary ascendancy on the diamond; rock fans can get a clear sense that for any particular band, there are X fans willing to actually leave their speakers and living room behind and pay vastly inflated prices for tickets and beer to listen to the music get played live! in crowded, dingy, seedy environments -- whether there are 500 people or 100,000 people, you get an instant and visceral idea of the size of the audience. Even comic book fans can make pilgrimages to various instant Meccas and find themselves gathered among hordes of like-minded followers of the blue, red, yellow and black, and attendance figures, admittedly somewhat inflated through any of several hazes, commercial, alcoholic, fanatic, etc., can easily be obtained from the show promoters. Our action figure passion flowers much more privately. Oh, sure, you can hang out at Kaybee or Walmart and find a few like- feathered birds any day, or go to any number of toy shows in almost every state of the Union and find fellow enthusiasts by the dozens, but I think anyone would agree that those events and those turnouts don't really reflect the fan base for figures. I certainly don't go to every local show -- and unlike comics, or any number of other hobby passions, there really isn't a single signature "monster" con for toys, or action figures, at which we could begin to number at least the most zealous of our flock. And of my collecting friends, I'd say at most maybe a third -- tops -- will actually have the time and wherewithal to attend even the larger local shows. Sure, one could begin to extrapolate the fan base from numbers like that, but for one thing, I just don't think toy shows pull in representative numbers of action figure collectors; for another, I think there are better ways to skin this particular (numerical) feline. (Why would anyone _want_ to skin a cat, by the way? They can't make very good eatin', their pelts are known nowhere for insulation or even decorative value...is there really that much of a market for traditional tennis racket strings in this age of miracle fibers? Never mind....) COUNTER MEASURES As a starting point, Tracey suggested -- in response to her own question, which we both began to realize might well have been predominantly rhetorical -- just multiplying out the number of 'net figure collectors from rtaf to get a handle on the larger fan base. I saw two problems with this. One, I've never really had a precise sense of how many of us there are out there. Er, in here. I mean, I've hazarded a guess or two in my time, pegging -- so to speak -- the count at anywhere between 250 and 1,500, but between lurkers and virtual transients, the ubiquitous and the profiteering, it's really hard to, uh, figure just how many people frequent rtaf. Oh, sure, we could probably sort and count the number of posters over a sample period (uh, you could -- I haven't the patience), but even that would only count the subgroup of figurers who take the trouble to actually post. Surely there must be others who are merely coming along for the ride. And the second obstacle to this path to the counting is that I have _no_ idea how our numbers on rec.toys.action-figures relate to the larger presence of collectors out in the non- electronic world. Would you multiply by 50? 100? 10,000? Appealing though the extrapolation may otherwise have been in terms of convenience and simplicity, given these imprecisions I just didn't think it would generate the numbers we needed with any real accuracy. WELL, THERE'S ME...AND KEVIN...AND ERIC...AND ROXI...JEFF... MARCIA...LISA...TIM...JARED...MICHAEL...LARRY...JACK...JASON...ED ...ROD...JON...TJ...SCOTT...MARK...AND JIM, THAT'S TWENTY RIGHT THERE...UH, I'LL NEED SOMEBODY ELSE'S FINGERS NOW.... Another approach occurred to me. Why not go the opposite direction -- consider the numbers of _figures_ themselves, and then jump from there to the size of the fan base. This makes a fair amount of sense. Oh, sure, lots of people collect more than one of some figures -- heck, some people collect more than one of _all_ figures, and an even less hygienic group is presumed to collect dozens upon dozens of certain "priceless" figures for instant transubstantiation into ungodly amounts of holy holy cash -- but even adjusting for those kind of variations, the production numbers of the more popular figures should provide a very appealing launch point for our estimate. And if you think about it, commercialism and capitalism being what they are, the manufacturers are, theoretically at least, in a position where it's in their great best interest to try to prefigure the market's size as accurately as possible, so that they can scale production to match (and hopefully saturate) it. Oh, sure, judging from some of their other production decisions, we're talking about group minds that can add two and two and get eleven as often as they get four, but even so, I think the production runs are a terrific starting point for this kind of measure. So. This makes everything easy now, yes? No. Because, for the most part, and despite the occasional practice of actually tattooing the figures themselves with ascending numbers ('cause we collectors love that so much, remember? Pfagh, as if the 12,345th figure that rolled out of the press is any more play-worthy, or admiration-worthy, than the 123,456th -- and if those numbers even _correspond_ to anything like a figure's actual position in the production run, a fact that has never been confirmed and which the Mother company of all figure-numberers -- Playmates, and I have to say another noun suggested itself to me before I decided to go with "company" -- has clearly screwed this up in the past), the manufacturers are _very_ close-mouthed about their production numbers. UH, TEN. WE MADE TEN OF THAT ONE....NO, FIFTY....FIFTY- *THOUSAND*.... Given that in most industries, crowing about "how many for how much" is almost a pastime in itself, I'm not sure why. Oh, I could understand the smaller producers not wanting the lesser scale of their operations to put off any potential new investors, and, similarly, larger manufacturers might be chary about revealing the decline of a particular line...and the more cynical among us might seek to point out that, given the fact that many of the manufacturers are delighted to foster the false belief that every last lump of plastic they generate is going to emerge over time as a precious and priceless "collectible," I can see it being in that sub-interest to foster the belief that they make, say, only 50 or 100 (or 1,701) of each figure. Of course, that's not the case (at least not most of the time). As benighted as most of the companies so often are, they do understand that you can choke a market through insufficiency as easily as you can drown it with overproduction. Hence the occasional gratifying reissue of things like cases of all-Xena figures, for example. And so again this "market driven" guidance from without, a force that -- absent the perverse, self-serving and coprophilic skewering dropped into the process by the no- value-added-resellers -- would tend to connect the market rather neatly to the output of the apparatus of production. So how many of these crazy figures do they _make_? Well, given the close-mouthedness of most of the major players, I think we have only two avenues to explore. One is Todd McFarlane's McFarlane Toys, and the other is the already- noted Playmates Toys' practice of numbering their individual figures. In an interview back in August 1996 with "Action Figure Scalping & Irresponsible Price Inflation" (oh, sorry, I guess the actual title is "Action Figure News & Toy Review"), Todd McFarlane spoke at some length about the McToys' production model. Though we have to remember he was speaking somewhat casually, he tossed out numbers in the range of 600,000 (!) for each figure series. And though he did not expressly say so, I have to assume that that number reflects the _total_ number of figures in a particular assortment -- meaning McToys produces in the range of 100,000 of each individual figure, based on a six- to-an-assortment count, which admittedly varies at times. Similarly, if you go by the admittedly loose numeration reflected in the six-digit numbers stamped into the tender feet of Playmates' Star Trek toys, you get numbers that actually aren't that far off from McToys runs (at least in the initial Star Trek series; while some figures reputedly ran to the 3 or 5 hundred thousand, it's the same order of magnitude and a good touchstone for our valuation), despite the fact that McFarlane is an "upstart" company often referred to (by themselves and others) as smaller-sized newcomers compared to the "old boys" like Kenner and even Toy Biz (who admittedly aren't so "old," but are pretty darned big in terms of production). IS ANYONE STILL AWAKE? Putting aside things like unsold peg-hangers and multiple purchases (not to mention the fact that there are as many different _kinds_ of collectors as there are different lines, and different people), I don't think it's that far off to go with the 100,000 figure as a baseline. While I have an unsubstantiated sense that things like "Star Wars" figures sell considerably more than that, there are lots of other lines that surely sell far less. And though it is after all only a ballpark figure, off by perhaps as much as 50% in either direction, it's a good solid start. (And begging of course the other question of who is a collector and who isn't -- not to be at all elitist, but is someone with _one_ figure who bought it on a whim a collector? We'd probably all agree that she isn't...but where to draw the line thereafter? I'm not going to go off into this, but it is worth thinking about) And when I think about the idea of 100,000 action figure fans out there, 100,000 people across the world who, let's say, buy at least ten figures a year, who might not buy a copy of Tomart's Action Figure Digest but would certainly not pass up the chance to leaf through one on a supermarket checkout line, who stop short in the hustle and bustle of any given week to stare delightedly at some particular figure, deriving therefrom a sense of connectedness and warmth, however fleeting...well, 100,000 does not seem inordinately far off. And getting back to the path that led us in here, if we nigh-arbitrarily assign rtaf a "population" of 1,000 people (lurker-, poster-, seller- and even bypasser-inclusive), we can instantly see some interesting numerical ramifications. (As a math teacher told me long, long ago in junior high school, if you're the one setting up the examples, why not make the division really simple?) For one thing, even if you take the range of collectors at 50,000-100,000, we can quickly see that rtaf reflects something between 1 and 2 percent of the total. Now, that's not a bad sample, statistically speaking, when you think that the grand and appalling parade of pop culture via the television is basically ordered by something like 1,600 "families" every month -- one helluva lot less than 1% of the tv watching population. And it makes sense on that aforementioned gut level -- the stuff I see being talked about on rtaf _does_ correspond pretty closely to what I see in the "outside world" of TRUs and flea markets, toy shows and Targets, etc. "THE EARTH IS DOOMED WHEN RO-TARR STALKS...." Where is this all going, you might ask? Well, nowhere, really....what else is new? <grin> This all arose as a response by Tracey to my delight at finding -- of all things -- a Rotarr standing patiently and proudly next to the cash register at the checkout line at our neighborhood supermarket last night. We had dashed out late last night for an impromptu dinner, having spent the better part of the afternoon languishing in the unusually high 90-plus degree San Francisco heat, and were it not for the fact that pizza just seemed too darned _hot_ to eat even after the sun had set and evenings' cool begun to wrestle with daytime's lingering warmth, we wouldn't have left the apartment at all. But we did, and, after amassing what we call a "snack" meal (a little bit of this, some odds and ends from the deli counter, chips, some fruit, and hey, lookit that banana cream pie!), we waited patiently in the checkout line to pay and get on with it. And it was exactly at this point that Tracey leaned over and pointed my gaze towards the next checkout stand. "Isn't that a Spawn figure?" Bless her heart, indeed it was. "Bless your heart, Tracey - - indeed it is! It's a Rotarr, brand-new from Spawn 8!" And while it might not have been my first choice from Spawn 8, as we started talking to the cashier about it, and I saw the sheer joy in his eyes at his Rotarr figure, I realized yet again how wonderful it is that beauty is indeed entrenched firmly in the beholder's eye. This fellow was just delighted by his odd little homunculus, and so, by association, was I. He had, it turned out, just picked it up before his shift began that day, and no sooner arrived at work than popped it free of its confining bubble to stand guard over the register through the day's travails. Like my experience a week or two back, discovering an action figure on a San Francisco Muni bus, it was a delight to encounter Rotarr at the grocery store. More delightful than doing so at a toy store, or in a friend's collection. Maybe it's my underlying underdog attitude about our hobby, whose glories go so unrecognized by the general public, but it makes my day when I spot a figure in some incongruous spot. I'd love to see a BTAS Joker sitting atop my dentist's shelf, a Han Solo in Carbonite lingering on a post office counter, or a Water Wars Storm dispensing air freshener on a cabbie's dashboard (not a bad idea, that). So here's to finding Spawn figures at hot dog stands! Total Justice in traffic court! X-Men at the barber shop! GI Joe's in restaurants! Cy-Boars at church socials! Batman in bakeries! Power Rangers at the putt-putt green! Aliens on the subway! (Hmmm, maybe that one's redundant....) "Figures, figures, everywhere...." _Then_ maybe we'll have a better idea of how many action figure lovers there really are....
Comments? Drop me a line....